home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
121294
/
12129922.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
4KB
|
83 lines
<text id=94TT1727>
<title>
Dec. 12, 1994: On the Money:No Pain, Just Gain
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
Dec. 12, 1994 To the Dogs
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
ON THE MONEY, Page 74
No Pain, Just Gain
</hdr>
<body>
<p>By John Rothchild
</p>
<p> A couple of years ago, word got out that Japanese investment
houses were reimbursing their customers for losses in their
stock market. As a veteran of losses in our stock market, it
occurred to me that this was one heck of an idea that was definitely
worth imitating over here. So last week I was thrilled to learn
that Mellon Bank had taken a step in the right direction. It
picked up the $130 million tab for some unfortunate investments
its advisers made for clients in one of the bank's subsidiaries.
</p>
<p> You may also have read that several mutual-fund companies in
the U.S. reached into their own pockets to cover recent losses
in their money-market funds, even though they didn't have to.
They acted out of the goodness of their hearts, and also to
avoid a mass exodus of dollars from their funds and into savings
accounts. Wall Street is showing a lot of compassion this holiday
season.
</p>
<p> I called Mellon to get the details on its largesse. The p.r.
person there, Margaret Cohen, assured me that Mellon was under
no obligation to make good on any bad investments. She said
the bank was happy to make a voluntary contribution to help
out customers in its trust departments, where the losses happened.
The idea was to continue to maintain a positive working relationship
with these bigwigs. This reminded me of the millions of little
wigs who have had a tough year in the stock market--like me.
A couple of my stocks have gone down, and it would cost my brokerage
firm, Smith Barney, a lot less than $130 million to maintain
a positive working relationship with me. My list of downers
includes a muni bond fund that I bought in anticipation of low
inflation and lower interest rates, a gold fund I bought in
anticipation of high inflation and higher interest rates, two
China funds mentioned in an earlier column, a Turkey fund I
bought because international expert Barton Biggs was quoted
in the press as liking Turkey (maybe he meant to visit), and
a handful of issues recently favored by Fidelity's Peter Lynch.
</p>
<p> Being the writer for Lynch's books ought to give me an advantage
in such matters, but I've shown a proven talent for ignoring
his many winners and attaching my money to the small number
of duds. This includes Sunbelt Nursery, down about 80%; 50-Off
Stores, which is more than 50 off since I bought it; and D& N
Financial and Supercuts, all of which are under water.
</p>
<p> I called Smith Barney and asked if I could get a bailout deal
similar to Mellon's. Because I make my own ill-advised investment
decisions without the help of my broker, who no doubt has better
ideas, I figured I was a great candidate for reimbursement.
At least Smith Barney couldn't be accused of paying me off to
cover up my broker's mistakes. And whatever modest sum it might
choose to advance me would go a long way toward cementing my
future loyalty. But spokesman Bob Connor wasn't buying any of
this, and Cohen at Mellon said there was no chance that Mellon
Bank would pay for my mistakes in the future if I moved my account
over there. Personally, I think both firms are being short-sighted,
especially when you consider that banks are about to get government
permission to compete with the brokerage houses. Soon there
will be a fierce tug-of-war for your business and mine, and
the one that gets mine will be the one that offers something
extra, such as the kind of loss protection that's just been
extended to the bigwigs at Mellon.
</p></body>
</article>
</text>